Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Judge Not, That Ye Be Not Judged

Dear class,

Today's readings are taken from 1Kings 6,7 and Matthew 7.

Matthew 7 concludes the Jesus' Sermon on the Mount and as with the previous 2 chapters, contain a chockfull of important principles.

Opening this is section is the oft misunderstood and misused statement on "judging".
The problem is when one stops at verse one when clearly, Jesus went on to clarify what he meant in the next 4 verses.

2 things we note in this passage.
1) v.2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. 
In a sense, it could be taken as the ultimate judgment which all will face. We think of the concepts of being merciful and forgiving in Mat 5:7; 6:14,15.
In another sense, one realises that those who have the habit of pointing fingers, often get pointed at without sympathy. We reap what we sow! (c.f. Gal 6:7.8)

2) v.3-5 basically refers to the attitude. Even when Jesus makes it clear, there are people who would use these verses to deflect the purest and most well meaning intentions of another by saying things like ,"we are all sinners!" or "you are a sinner too!". First of all, we note that whether be it a mote or a plank, the need is for them to be removed! A sin is a sin regardless of who comes round to convict it! Would a driver stopped for speeding turn around and accuse the police officer, "Don't tell me you've never exceeded the speed limit before!"? Granted, obviously a person who lives in habitual sin, is not going to carry a lot of weight in his judgments. In all likelihood, the judgment made might not even be well informed or sound! But the point from the recipient's angle should be whether the judgment is an accurate reflection and not on the spiritual state of the judge. On the other hand, entering into a judgment situation without the facts and worse having the wrong attitude will just make things worse.

Jesus said in Jhn 7:24 - Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. 
The problem is not with the "judging". We are to exhort one another (Heb 3:13; 10:25). Discipline is necessary in the church for the sake souls (Rom 16:17; 2Th 3:14,15). Elders have the responsibility to feed and defend the flock (Act 20:28; Ti 1:9). The problem is with the attitude, motivation and sometimes prerequisite behind it. We should not shy away from "judging" just for fear of being rejected or rebutted but rather, be motivated to adopt a pure, sincere attitude, in love, and to ensure we live pure, blameless lives too! It was never Jesus' intention for brethren to "mind their own business" and let one another wallow in their sins. Remember, we still need to remove both the plank and the mote!

Practically speaking, we all need to be more aware and caring to one another. Most of us, if not all, can attest to the fact that best friends are often able to be "brutally" honest with one another. Why? Because we know one another well enough to realise the intentions of the friend. Recalled what bro Yong Yaw mentioned in his last sermon about "disfellowship". Why is it difficult? Because there was little "fellowship" to begin with in the first place! As brothers and sisters in Christ, it is so important for us to develop a close knit bond. Paul described it as a body parts "knit together" (Col 2:19), "fitly joined together" (Eph 4:16). Such that when the situation calls for rebuke, the bitter pill becomes easier to give and to swallow.

Let us work together and help one another to greater heights and to our ultimately heavenly goal.

in Him
Paul

--
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. ~ Hebrews 3:13

Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip. ~ Hebrews 2:1


Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Dying In The Wilderness


Dear class,

Today's readings are taken from Numbers 26-28 and Matthew 2.

As the Israelites came to an end of their sojourn (finally!) we are reminded of the fulfilment of God's pronouncement on a stiff-necked generation. Recall the incident of the 12 spies (Num 13,14). Because of their lack of faith God had determined that the only 2 souls in that generation who would step into the promised land would be Caleb and Joshua, the 2 spies who had brought back a good report (Num 14:26-30).

Such a difficult crowd the Israelites were that even Moses fell prey to their disobedience, as we are brought to remembrance the incident at Meribah (c.f. Num 20:8-13)
Num 29:14: For ye rebelled against my commandment in the desert of Zin, in the strife of the congregation, to sanctify me at the water before their eyes: that is the water of Meribah in Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin.

I can help but feel sorry for Moses! By human counts, Moses did what he could. At that point, he was probably vexed to death by a stiff-necked people, complaining and whining away. And it was not as if God did not ask him to strike the rock before to get water. And yet it was just this fine line between speaking and striking that made Moses right or wrong before God, that determined whether he died in the wilderness as the others in that generation, or passed into the promised land.
Notice the harsh judgment upon Moses "For ye REBELLED against my commandment" Wow God, hey give the man a break! Here was a faithful man of God, the meekest man on earth (Num 12:3), whom God Himself honoured and said whom he speaks to "mouth to mouth" (Num 12:8)! But yes, if we will not obey God's Word to the last jot and tittle, we transgress His law and it doesn't matter what good we have done. We have to face the consequences. In that matter, God still "gave face" to Moses by allowing the water to flow, yet Moses had to suffer the fate like the rest of the unbelieving generation.

You know, it's easy for us to just say, "oh but I'm doing good in the Lord" or "see? I am blessed by God to do such and such", but think of Moses. Did he not also? What good is good if not in the name of God, i.e. AUTHORISED by God? It is but nought and sin. (c.f. Mat 7:21-23) We need to be very very careful not to go about establishing our own righteousness, thinking we can "outdo" God or even believing to please God.

Otherwise, we too will die in this present wilderness and be lost in eternity.

The Lord bless us and keep us that we always strive to do EXACTLY as He commands, turning neither to the left nor right.

in Him
Paul


--
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. ~ Hebrews 3:13

Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart. ~ 2Timothy 2:22

Monday, May 6, 2013

God Is Not A Man


Dear class,

Today's readings are taken from Numbers 23-25 and Matthew 1

The account in Numbers continues and rounds off the "Balaam incident". As a good reminder and for the benefit of the newcomers, I attach a previous post on the "Doctrine of Balaam" below.

Besides this, one very striking statement from the inspired mouth of Balaam is from Num 23:19
God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Before we we go into this, let us notice an important fact here - was Balaam a willing prophet in this case? Most certainly not! He had greed all filled up in his mind, yet under the influence of the Holy Spirit, he prophesied exactly what God wanted the people to hear. This illustrates an important point - the influence of the the Holy Spirit has always been for a specific, miraculous purpose and it did not necessarily imply of anything with regards to the medium. The Holy Spirit did not and does not come upon any individual to affect him morally! Balaam was obviously morally mal-guided. Why, the donkey was not even a moral being! (c.f. Num 22:28-30) Yet both spoke as inspired of the Spirit. So the point here is that Holy Spirit influence, as with all miracles, were for a specific purpose from God to establish His will. In the case of Balaam, the message is clear - no one can go more or less of the Word of God. (c.f. Num 22:18, 38; 23:12; 24:12-13) Miracles were not a "given" to be used "as and when" one feels like. The Holy Spirit guides us today through and only through the Word but will not and has never directly influenced our moral behaviour. It is still up to us to exercise our will to allow ourselves to be guided by God through His Word. The grace and providence of God certainly opens up avenues to the pure in heart, such that they become convicted by the Word. But God's mercy will drip off the cynical and stone-hearted like water off a duck's back.

"God is not a man...neither the son of man" seems to be a "no-brainer". At the very least, the fact that we attribute the title "God" obviously shows a significant difference.
Yet we note that the norm since to be contrary to that. Observe what the psalmist wrote:
Psa 115:2  Wherefore should the heathen say, Where is now their God?
Psa 115:3  But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.
Psa 115:4  Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.
Psa 115:5  They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:
Psa 115:6  They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:
Psa 115:7  They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat.
Psa 115:8  They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them.

And we are all quite familiar with the multitude of legends, fables and mythologies across all cultures that very often depict "gods" like humans. As bro Yong Yaw pointed out in his powerful sermon yesterday, such are those with that the atheists would label as religion being a "psychological crutch". And what a big and "comprehensive" (aka Kiasu!) one for some! (c.f. Act 17:22,23)

The God of the Bible, the Alpha and the Omega, the Creator of the universe, our Great Saviour, is not like those! Simply because, He wasn't conceived of and created by the imaginations of man. This fundamental fact is often overlooked when man at times tries to reason out God's actions. The prophet Isaiah couldn't have put it any better in Isa 55:8,9 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts."
Just imagine - if the foolishness of God is wiser than man (1Co 1:25), how can man hope to fully comprehend the wisdom and glory of God? What we can appreciate is what God would reveal to us and that is His love and of our obedience to His Word. Beyond that, we find ourselves in self-defeating speculation that can only lead to confusion, cynicism and ultimately, death (Pro 14:12; 16:25).

Just in case some of us might be left scratching our heads by the part about God not needing to "repent", when there seem to be clear instances where the bible says God "repents" (e.g. Gen 6:6,7; Ex 32:14), the very concept that God is not a man and 1Co 1:25, explains the apparent discrepancy. Just as one could jump at 1Co 1:25 to claim that God could be "foolish", one certainly can use the verses in Gen 6:6,7, etc to claim that God did repent! As we've mentioned on a couple of occasions in class, 1Co 1:25 points to the fact, just as Isaiah did in Isa 55, of the great contrast and disparity between God's wisdom/thoughts and man's. Thus it is with this concept that we can correctly understand what the writers are trying to portray in using "repent" as applied to God.
To give an illustration in the style of 1Co 1:25, if we understand "repent" as some sort of "regret" as a result of doing something without foresight, then the other extreme end would be an action taken with great wisdom and careful consideration. Thus the "repentance" of God would be far better than man's most well thought out actions. In those instances where God "repented", it was not a case of God's "plan B" but rather either due to man's failings resulting in a detracting from God's desired will for man or the mercy of God that put man back on track. The concept of "repent" is thus brought down to man's level of understanding to show God's perfect control over all circumstances. Note it's the circumstances, but not man's actions that are controlled.

Let us be always reminded of the profoundness in Num 23:19 and not go about establishing our own misconceptions of God but look to the final disposition of Job and ever be in awe and reverence of our Creator and Saviour.

in Him
Paul


Doctrine of Balaam

What is the doctrine of Balaam and of the Nicolaitans? The doctrine of Balaam should sound familiar. (Remember the Balaam puzzle??? :))If you recall,Balaam, son of Beor, was the prophet who was hired by Balak the King of Moab to curse the Israelites (Num 22-24). After failed attempts as we read of the the account, greed drove him to finally succeed in causing the people to sin, indirectly causing the death of 24000 Israelites! (Num 25:9, c.f. Num 31:16) As illustrated in Rev 2:14b, the doctrine of Balaam is basically that of worldliness and greed. Here was a church which had all the bells and whistles with their proclamation of faith, yet allowed members to continue in worldly practices like fornication. Remember that sin is not only in commission but also omission! If we fail to convict erring brethren, it is as good as being an accomplice!
As for the doctrine of Nicolaitans, there are a number of views. Barnes suggests that the Nicolaitans were a specific group of people who held the doctrine of Balaam. Clarke wrote in his commentary that the Nicolaitans were possibly a gnostic sect (people who believed in worldly knowledge in salvation), subscribing to polygamy and mixing of pagan rites. But he too is of the opinion that those who held the doctrine of Balaam and Nicolaitans and the Gnostics as a whole belonged to the same group. It seems unlikely that the inspired writer would have left something of importance to speculation, especially when it was mentioned previously in Rev 2:6. When we examine the progression of the argument in Rev 2:14,15, it seems to support what the commentators suggested. v. 14 was a broad reference to an OT example and v.15 describes a specific group in their time. Essentially, we need to beware of worldliness that has so often crept into the church. It does not help matters that some of the "mega churches" peddle the "prosperity gospel" and perpetuate the bombardstic, ra-ra element of the entertainment industry, making a huge mockery of the sobriety, purity of the gospel truth. Nicolaitans of today are alive and all around! We will all do well to identify such and beware of them.

2Pe 2:10  But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.
2Pe 2:11  Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.
2Pe 2:12  But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
2Pe 2:13  And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;
2Pe 2:14  Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
2Pe 2:15  Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;
2Pe 2:16  But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

Jud 1:11  Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

Rev 2:14  But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.


--
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. ~ Hebrews 3:13

Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart. ~ 2Timothy 2:22

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Walking By Faith


Dear class,

The readings for today are taken from Numbers 12-14 and Revelation 19.

The passages from Numbers illustrates vividly, both positively and negatively the true concept of what it means to walk "by faith".

Let us first revisit 2 central verses concerning "faith".
Heb 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Rom 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

This as we seen and have seen previously, faith is a concrete concept. Faith can and must be developed through and only through His Word.

Firing the opening salvo is a negative example of that of Miriam and Aaron.
In a rather disappointing turn of events, it was now Miriam and Aaron's turn to turn their backs against their brother, Moses.
The blood relationship not withstanding, we recall it was Miriam, right form the very beginning who witnessed the great faith of her mother in attempting to bring up Moses and the greater providence of God who in the end saw it through that Moses was raised up and not just in any way, but in the wisdom and ways of the Egyptians, which was to prove invaluable in the ultimate encounter with Pharaoh. And of course, Aaron, the spokesman, was by the side of Moses all this while, witnessing and attesting to the great faith demonstrated by His brother.
Yet in a petty show of envy and jealousy, over a seemingly legitimate reason, Miriam and Aaron sought to usurp the authority of Moses.
First up, we note that the actions, however right and justified, will never cover our intentions. Moses may have been wrong in their sight to marry a foreigner (c.f. Ex 34:16) or maybe enter into a polygamous relationship. However, it is clear that the reason why his siblings spoke up was not to correct their brother but only out of envy. It is no coincidence or even something put in out of the blue that Num 12:3 pointed out that Moses was the meekest person above all men which were upon the face of the earth. If there had been anyone who would be the first to shy away from the limelight, it would be Moses! Recall his great reluctance in the encounter with God at the burning bush. (Ex 3,4) The only reason why Moses was where he was, was because God had commanded him to!

Then, the lack of faith between the 2 older siblings was evident because they did not trust in God's chosen. How was it manifest? Was it because they had witnessed Moses' incompetence (e.g. the example of King Saul)? Was it because Moses had sinned and/or led the people to sin? (In fact it was Aaron who has first failed in the incident of the gold calf!) No. They did not have faith, they did not trust God, not because of Moses inadequacies but on the contrary, in spite of the great works God had performed through Moses.

And then was the dual example of great faith and equally great lack of it - the account of the 12 spies.
It was the the same group of spies that sought out the same places, saw the same things and brought back the same produce. Yet what a vast difference in attitudes between Caleb and Joshua and the rest of the spies!
In the eyes of Caleb and Joshua, the fine produce of the land was further testament to God's promise of the "land flowing with milk and honey". Yet, the rest of the spies chose to ignore the part that God promised but focus on the inhabitants.

Caleb and Joshua showed great faith in that they wholly believed in what God had promised. The fact that they physically saw the rich produce was but a bonus to their proper understanding of the nature of God. Notice their accurate observation in verses 14:7-9
And they spake unto all the company of the children of Israel, saying, The land, which we passed through to search it, is an exceeding good land.
If the LORD delight in us, then he will bring us into this land, and give it us; a land which floweth with milk and honey.
Only rebel not ye against the LORD, neither fear ye the people of the land; for they are bread for us: their defence is departed from them, and the LORD is with us: fear them not.

Blind faith? FAR from it! On the contrary, what the Israelites displayed was blind disbelief. It was faithlessness IN SPITE of the evidence! The rock solid faith of the 2 spies was based upon God's Word and the numerous works brought to pass by The Lord. Faith that was demonstrated by doing what God had commanded and being convinced that God will bring His promises to pass.

How do we walk by faith? It's not about flipping a coin and letting God "decide". It's not about making choices that have no basis whatsoever. It's not about sincerely pursuing what one perceives to be pleasing to God.
It's simply about taking God at His Word and carrying it out. It's about focussing on doing what is right before Him. That is what Moses did, in spite of the odds and challenges. That is what Caleb and Joshua did in spite of the opposition and even risk of death.

This is what we should do even today. Remember, with God, we are the majority! Let us continue in our walk of faith, that we too may finally lay hold on life eternal.

in Him
Paul


--
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. ~ Hebrews 3:13

In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began; But hath in due times manifested his word through preaching, which is committed unto me according to the commandment of God our Saviour; ~ Titus 1:2,3